![]() ![]() ![]() Existing Video Enhance AI customers with an active license get Topaz Video AI v3.0 for free.$299.00 for new customers, which includes one year of app updates.Important performance and stability improvements.Running tasks in parallel with filter support.Using this new code base allows us to provide some of your most requested features, such as: We built Topaz Video AI v3.0 from the ground up to include new functionality, such as video stabilization, improved enhancement capabilities, and a better user experience. The technology is 100% good but the interface is assumning too much situations, and not let to avoid a lot of problems.Topaz Video AI gives you unlimited access to the world’s leading production-grade neural networks for video upscaling, de-interlacing, motion interpolation, and shake stabilization - all optimized for your local workstation. Those are my thoughts after maybe 4000 videos processed. Because maybe the picture is clean… but with deinterlacing artifacts, or maybe is well upscaled, but the aspect ratio is not the right and the picture is squeezed. If we mix concepts, 50% of times the results are not improving the original. The deinterlace have to be only deinterlace) I think the problem is the interface should show different stepsġ, input pixel aspect (if not 50% of times we are defforming)Ģ deinterlace (independent of enhancing method. ![]() If we have to deinterlace and upscale a video with grain we have to use Dione alghoryhtm that is so bad with the grain… And if we selet proteus or Artemis, the upscale is ok and the degrain is ok, but the deinterlace is destroying the results You are assuming that any video have one problem.īut 90% times the videos have a lot of problems. ![]() I want to explain better the issue with the deinterlace. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |